For Fuck's Sake...
Saturday, 26 April 2008
Monday, 21 April 2008
Liars, Murderers, and Bastards!!
Paving the way for another 'False Flag' Terror attack?? Fucking right he is!
US President George Bush has said he believes another 9/11 attack on the United Sates should be considered a strong possibility and warned that such an attack could originate from Pakistan. In an interview with America’s ABC TV, Mr Bush said: "If another September 11 style attack is being planned, it probably is being plotted in Pakistan, and not Afghanistan."Bush said if the terrorists were planning such attacks, they would be found out. During the interview he also said that Washington had no intention of attacking Iran, but added that it was the responsibility of the US to convince the world of Iran's capacity to enrich its uranium capacities for a potentially threatening nuclear weapons program. It was, therefore, in the interest of Washington to pressurise the Iranians to prevent them from enriching their uranium haul. He said the US was continually gaining knowledge about Iran's activities in Iraq. Bush said the United States would bring Iran to justice if it continued to try to use agents or surrogates to infiltrate Iraq and harm US troops and Iraqi citizens. Asked to clarify "bring to justice," Bush replied: "It means capture or kill, is what that means."
US President George Bush has said he believes another 9/11 attack on the United Sates should be considered a strong possibility and warned that such an attack could originate from Pakistan. In an interview with America’s ABC TV, Mr Bush said: "If another September 11 style attack is being planned, it probably is being plotted in Pakistan, and not Afghanistan."Bush said if the terrorists were planning such attacks, they would be found out. During the interview he also said that Washington had no intention of attacking Iran, but added that it was the responsibility of the US to convince the world of Iran's capacity to enrich its uranium capacities for a potentially threatening nuclear weapons program. It was, therefore, in the interest of Washington to pressurise the Iranians to prevent them from enriching their uranium haul. He said the US was continually gaining knowledge about Iran's activities in Iraq. Bush said the United States would bring Iran to justice if it continued to try to use agents or surrogates to infiltrate Iraq and harm US troops and Iraqi citizens. Asked to clarify "bring to justice," Bush replied: "It means capture or kill, is what that means."
Thursday, 17 April 2008
More Fucking Cameras!!
Yet more 'Technology' to control and impoverish us. They watch us, They Fine us, They Manipulate us... all in the name of Safety and protecting us...Who the fuck are they trying to kid??!!?
MENACE OF NEW SPEED CAMERAS
THE war on motorists is being stepped up with Big Brother speed cameras that track every inch of a car journey, campaigners warned last night.
The hi-tech traps calculate a driver’s average speed over several miles, unlike the current cameras that only snap at a specific spot. Critics say the new machines would lead to a huge number of drivers amassing penalty points. Others believe the equipment is being designed to squeeze yet more money out of beleaguered motorists who are already struggling with the spiralling costs of fuel, car tax and repairs. A Motorists Against Detection spokesman said: “If this goes live, it would lead to even more motorists losing their licences – and possibly their livelihood.“Why should the police hammer motorists while the real criminals get away scot-free? “The idea is to trial this kit out so they can roll it out on every straight stretch of road in the country. The only people who will benefit are the technology firms behind the cameras. People are still dying on our roads.”Those caught going over the limit – even for a moment – could be hit with a three-point penalty and a £60 fine.Thirty-four cameras are being tested on a five-mile stretch of the A13 in east London from Canning Town to the Gorsebrook interchange. They are also being used in tests to enforce a 20mph limit on a residential street in Camden, north London, and in pilot schemes in Scotland and Nottingham
The machines are already used to check speeds at motorway roadworks. If the trials prove successful the intention is for the scheme to be rolled out across the whole of Britain. The RedFusion system uses digital technology to take a picture of a car’s number plate.When the motorist passes the next camera, another picture of the number plate is captured.The time it took to travel between the two points is then processed in a central computer to give the average speed.The system even works if vehicles change lanes. An Association of British Drivers spokesman said: “It’s not how fast you’re driving but how you’re driving that’s important. The problem with these cameras is that they will penalise 24 hours a day, even at three in the morning.“They are no alternative to police patrolling the roads. Our problem is less with the cameras, more with the speed limits, which are set far too low. “We need a police patrol back on the roads to stop aggressive driving, driving under the influence, tailgating – all these behaviours that are causing accidents.“Speed is actually only one tiny factor – it is responsible for only five per cent of accidents. The new camera is made by RedSpeed International, based in Kidderminster, Worcs, which has already been criticised for its super-cameras that allow fines to be printed and sent out within half an hour of the offence.
MENACE OF NEW SPEED CAMERAS
THE war on motorists is being stepped up with Big Brother speed cameras that track every inch of a car journey, campaigners warned last night.
The hi-tech traps calculate a driver’s average speed over several miles, unlike the current cameras that only snap at a specific spot. Critics say the new machines would lead to a huge number of drivers amassing penalty points. Others believe the equipment is being designed to squeeze yet more money out of beleaguered motorists who are already struggling with the spiralling costs of fuel, car tax and repairs. A Motorists Against Detection spokesman said: “If this goes live, it would lead to even more motorists losing their licences – and possibly their livelihood.“Why should the police hammer motorists while the real criminals get away scot-free? “The idea is to trial this kit out so they can roll it out on every straight stretch of road in the country. The only people who will benefit are the technology firms behind the cameras. People are still dying on our roads.”Those caught going over the limit – even for a moment – could be hit with a three-point penalty and a £60 fine.Thirty-four cameras are being tested on a five-mile stretch of the A13 in east London from Canning Town to the Gorsebrook interchange. They are also being used in tests to enforce a 20mph limit on a residential street in Camden, north London, and in pilot schemes in Scotland and Nottingham
The machines are already used to check speeds at motorway roadworks. If the trials prove successful the intention is for the scheme to be rolled out across the whole of Britain. The RedFusion system uses digital technology to take a picture of a car’s number plate.When the motorist passes the next camera, another picture of the number plate is captured.The time it took to travel between the two points is then processed in a central computer to give the average speed.The system even works if vehicles change lanes. An Association of British Drivers spokesman said: “It’s not how fast you’re driving but how you’re driving that’s important. The problem with these cameras is that they will penalise 24 hours a day, even at three in the morning.“They are no alternative to police patrolling the roads. Our problem is less with the cameras, more with the speed limits, which are set far too low. “We need a police patrol back on the roads to stop aggressive driving, driving under the influence, tailgating – all these behaviours that are causing accidents.“Speed is actually only one tiny factor – it is responsible for only five per cent of accidents. The new camera is made by RedSpeed International, based in Kidderminster, Worcs, which has already been criticised for its super-cameras that allow fines to be printed and sent out within half an hour of the offence.
Monday, 14 April 2008
Cunts on Castors
Here we fucking have it!! We pay - They fucking get pissed up!! Democracy!!???!! Guy Fawkes you were a fucking hero!!
The drinks are on us: Whitehall's wining and dining bill costs the taxpayer £5m
At least £5million of taxpayers' money was spent by ministers on wining and dining last year, official figures reveal.
More than £100,000 of the cash went on maintaining an exclusive Whitehall wine cellar.
Even the Department for International Development - responsible for distributing aid to the world's poorest countries - managed to spend more than £260,000.
In total, the £5million could have paid for 230 extra nurses, 190 teachers, 70 doctors, 170 police officers or 190 soldiers.
Embarrassingly, the biggest spender on Whitehall parties was the Treasury, which is struggling to contain an economic crisis caused by the credit crunch.
It and its associated departments spent £1.2million on alcohol and entertaining last year.
That was 20 times more than the Department for Work and Pensions and 100 times more than the Department for Children, Schools and Families, according to a series of Parliamentary answers.
The Foreign Office, meanwhile, revealed £108,000 was spent on "wine cellar costs" for ministers.
It is responsible for maintaining an exclusive wine store used for hospitality across government, which entertains 30,000 guests at more than 300 events a year.
It supplies everything from dinners at Chequers, the Prime Minister's country residence, to departmental receptions. There are around 39,000 bottles stashed away in the cellar, which is in the vaults of Lancaster House, off the Mall in London.
Its exact contents are a closely-guarded secret, although it is said to offer 180 individual clarets alone.
The shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Philip Hammond, said: "Hard-working families struggling to make ends meet will be surprised, to say the least, that Gordon Brown chooses to lavish millions on parties for civil servants while clobbering low-income families with yet more tax rises."
The second-highest spending department was that for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, which notched up a bill for £1million.
Foreign Office minister Meg Munn told MPs her department's total bill for catering, including food, staff, flowers, provision of sound equipment and alcohol, was £700,814.
The cost of keeping the Government wine cellar generously stocked took its total to £809,529. She said all expenditure had gone on entertaining "official contacts" and was in line with Treasury rules.
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs was next, with a £405,482 bill, followed by the Department for Communities and Local Government, at £388,292. But some of the smaller amounts will also raise eyebrows.
The International Development Department spent £265,360, while spending by the Scotland Office - which critics say is the most pointless department of all - went up by a third to £23,441.
Despite powers being devolved to the Scottish Executive, the department employed 20 policy officials and two Press officers. They are responsible for answering correspondence, but received fewer than 40 letters from MPs and peers last year.
The department says last year's spending on entertainment included the London launch of the Scottish Poppy Appeal and a reception on the day of the Queen's Birthday Parade.
The drinks are on us: Whitehall's wining and dining bill costs the taxpayer £5m
At least £5million of taxpayers' money was spent by ministers on wining and dining last year, official figures reveal.
More than £100,000 of the cash went on maintaining an exclusive Whitehall wine cellar.
Even the Department for International Development - responsible for distributing aid to the world's poorest countries - managed to spend more than £260,000.
In total, the £5million could have paid for 230 extra nurses, 190 teachers, 70 doctors, 170 police officers or 190 soldiers.
Embarrassingly, the biggest spender on Whitehall parties was the Treasury, which is struggling to contain an economic crisis caused by the credit crunch.
It and its associated departments spent £1.2million on alcohol and entertaining last year.
That was 20 times more than the Department for Work and Pensions and 100 times more than the Department for Children, Schools and Families, according to a series of Parliamentary answers.
The Foreign Office, meanwhile, revealed £108,000 was spent on "wine cellar costs" for ministers.
It is responsible for maintaining an exclusive wine store used for hospitality across government, which entertains 30,000 guests at more than 300 events a year.
It supplies everything from dinners at Chequers, the Prime Minister's country residence, to departmental receptions. There are around 39,000 bottles stashed away in the cellar, which is in the vaults of Lancaster House, off the Mall in London.
Its exact contents are a closely-guarded secret, although it is said to offer 180 individual clarets alone.
The shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Philip Hammond, said: "Hard-working families struggling to make ends meet will be surprised, to say the least, that Gordon Brown chooses to lavish millions on parties for civil servants while clobbering low-income families with yet more tax rises."
The second-highest spending department was that for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, which notched up a bill for £1million.
Foreign Office minister Meg Munn told MPs her department's total bill for catering, including food, staff, flowers, provision of sound equipment and alcohol, was £700,814.
The cost of keeping the Government wine cellar generously stocked took its total to £809,529. She said all expenditure had gone on entertaining "official contacts" and was in line with Treasury rules.
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs was next, with a £405,482 bill, followed by the Department for Communities and Local Government, at £388,292. But some of the smaller amounts will also raise eyebrows.
The International Development Department spent £265,360, while spending by the Scotland Office - which critics say is the most pointless department of all - went up by a third to £23,441.
Despite powers being devolved to the Scottish Executive, the department employed 20 policy officials and two Press officers. They are responsible for answering correspondence, but received fewer than 40 letters from MPs and peers last year.
The department says last year's spending on entertainment included the London launch of the Scottish Poppy Appeal and a reception on the day of the Queen's Birthday Parade.
Friday, 11 April 2008
Friday, 4 April 2008
Happy Birthday War
Five years of hell in a handcart, and we owe it all to those bastards of the New World Order, who had to remove this thorn in their side before the final nails can be hammered in the coffin of freedom.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
